EM Law are experts in drafting, negotiating and advising clients on supply of goods contracts. Our lead contracts lawyer is Neil Williamson who has extensive experience in advising clients on a wide range of commercial law matters.
Supply of Goods contracts: the following is an overview of some of most important business-to-business terms in standard terms for the supply of goods.
A buyer’s terms will provide:
Supply of Goods contracts should make express provision for the quantity of goods to be sold. Practical logistics may mean that the seller eventually delivers slightly more or less than the exact quantity specified in the contract, for example, because the goods ordered are difficult to count or weigh precisely. It is in the interests of the seller to cover this possibility by providing for tolerances to the contract quantity so that, for example, the seller is specifically entitled to deliver goods in quantities of up to (say) 5% more or less than the contract quantity. Failure to include an express provision along these lines will mean that rules unfavourable to the seller under section 30 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 will apply. The effect of these, broadly, is that:
The issue of whether payment should be adjusted to reflect the excess or shortfall of goods contracted for should also be addressed. If the supply of goods contract allows for a tolerance of more than a very small amount, provision is likely to be made for pro rata adjustment to the price.
Unless otherwise specified in the supply of goods contract, delivery will be deemed to take place at the seller’s premises (section 29(2), Sale of Goods Act 1979).
The parties will almost always wish to make specific provision as to the time for delivery since, in the absence of specific provision, the statutory rule merely provides that the seller is bound to deliver the goods within a reasonable time (section 29(3) Sale of Goods Act 1979. What is a reasonable time is a question of fact, to be determined by reference to the facts of each case, rather than as a matter of law (section 59, Sale of Goods Act 1979).
If time is not of the essence then the buyer’s failure to take delivery of goods at the time agreed does not in itself justify the seller disposing of them to someone else. Section 48 (3) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 enables the seller to resell perishable goods without notice to the buyer if the price is not paid when due. If the buyer will not take delivery of, or collect, the goods, it is sensible to provide for the seller to be able to store the goods at the buyer’s cost or to make specific provision enabling the seller to dispose of the goods.
The buyer, on the other hand, may incorporate in its purchase terms an obligation on the part of the seller to store the goods free of charge if the buyer cannot take delivery. The buyer will also wish to make clear to whom delivery can be made and who can sign for the goods.
The seller cannot completely exclude its liability for delivering damaged goods or not delivering the goods at all. It may, however, specify that delivery to the carrier is to be treated as delivery to the buyer.
If the seller commits a breach of any condition of a contract, the buyer is entitled to reject the goods and terminate the contract. The buyer’s right to reject is, however, lost if the buyer has accepted the goods. Under section 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, the buyer is deemed to have accepted the goods (and so loses the right to reject) in three situations:
The seller will want to prevent the buyer from seeking to escape from the contract by claiming that the goods have not been accepted and rejecting them.
A buyer, on the other hand, will wish to protect the right to reject in its purchase terms (and may seek to extend it).
Even if the parties have not addressed any other term of the contract in detail, they will almost certainly have considered the price to be paid. If there is no express agreement as to price, there will be an implied term that the buyer should pay a reasonable price (section 8, Sale of Goods Act 1979). However, a failure to agree a price in sale of goods contracts may well indicate that the parties have not yet reached a binding agreement.
If the seller wishes to vary the price after the contract has been concluded, there must be an express provision entitling it to do so.
Clear provision should be made as to whether the following items are to be included in the price or are extra:
VAT will be treated as included in the price unless the contract provides otherwise (section 19(2) Value Added Tax Act 1994). Therefore, it should be made clear in the standard terms that all prices are exclusive of VAT, assuming that the seller wishes to quote its prices on an exclusive basis.
The buyer’s purchase terms will provide for the price to be inclusive of as many extra items as possible, although a buyer would generally accept that, subject to receipt of a VAT invoice, VAT should be paid in addition to the price.
This is a question of the seller’s actual working practices but should always be specified. The date on which payment must be made should be tied to a given number of days after the date of the seller’s invoice or delivery of the goods, rather than the date of receipt of the invoice by the buyer.
It is common to include a provision stating that if payment is not made on the due date, the buyer must pay interest on the amount outstanding.
The seller may anticipate a situation in which the buyer is unable to pay and there are a number of methods by which the seller may seek some degree of security for payment:
The risk in the goods will pass at the same time as title to them passes unless otherwise agreed (section 20, Sale of Goods Act 1979). In standard terms of sale, risk is usually stated to pass at the time of delivery of the goods. This is on the basis that the seller will not wish to remain responsible for loss or damage to the goods up to the time when title passes, given that the effect of the basic retention of title clause is that title does not pass until the buyer has paid for the goods. The result is that if the goods are destroyed after delivery the buyer will remain liable for the price.
The standard terms should incorporate provisions covering the following areas and, when drafting, consideration should be given as to whether additional or more detailed boilerplate provisions may be appropriate:
For any questions you may have concerning supply of goods contracts contact Neil Williamson.
"Neil and his team have undertaken several items of legal work covering contracts, agreements and share option schemes for IMC Worldwide... View More Testimonials"
Gavin English MD IMC Worldwide Ltd
"Neil at EM Law advised us with regards to GDPR. He was thoughtful and thorough.... View More Testimonials"
COO of a Strategic Communications Agency
"I want to thank Neil at Emerging Law for his support and guidance whilst I have been setting up my own business. He has talked me through the step by step stages and legalities involved so that I can make informed decisions about my business approach... View More Testimonials"
Ayshen Ali founder Attainers Limited
"I felt incredibly fortunate to have come across Imogen. She was fantastic at helping at every juncture... View More Testimonials"
SM, Recruitment Manager
"Neil and Lauren were both very helpful in drafting contracts I needed for my firm... View More Testimonials"
Alex Mosley, Director Perrygate Property Limited
"Neil and Helen provided us with an employment contract and terms and conditions of business. We found Neil and Helen to be extremely informative and helpful throughout the process... View More Testimonials"
Grant Lambert MD Honor Search (Digital Recruitment)
"Neil Williamson, I cannot thank enough for his work and legal advice, which had brought the great result.... View More Testimonials"
"Neil was brilliant, patient and thorough guiding me through queries setting up my business to be compliant.... View More Testimonials"
Kate York, Photographer
"Neil and I worked alongside each other for several years securing software business overseas for Crown Agents... View More Testimonials"
Nick Small Director Nick Small Consulting
"What can I say about Imogen? She was the shining star in what was a very difficult time for me.... View More Testimonials"
VR, Nutritional Chef and Culinary Manager
"Imogen....has a very personable approach and is succinct in her communication. I would highly recommend her... View More Testimonials"
KE, Development Manager
"Imogen has always given me sound, objective and carefully considered legal advice.... View More Testimonials"
MB, Senior Sponsorship Manager
"Thank you for all your help with the matters regarding my company, you have been thorough in all aspects to the finer detail... View More Testimonials"
John Taylor Director Glo-bell London Ltd
"Neil is able to address complex issues, give us advice that we can follow and come up with creative solutions... View More Testimonials"
Ismet Yucetas CEO Middle East Air Drilling Services
"Imogen is a fantastic employment lawyer. Clear, supportive and very skilled in her area.... View More Testimonials"
LC, Director at a Management Consultancy
"Neil helped us structure, negotiate and put in place our first client software-as-a-service contracts. His technical and commercial advice was invaluable - he understands exactly where we are coming from... View More Testimonials"
Lena Rosenior CEO De Graft Management Ltd
"Cardno has worked closely with EM Law since 2013. The advice and support provided to our business by EM Law has been of a high quality, relevant to our requirements and more importantly helped us to make the appropriate decisions that have contributed to the success of our business... View More Testimonials"
George Mukkath Managing Director Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd
"We have been working with Neil for many years now, more recently on a retained basis because he has become someone we trust and who understands our business requirements. ... View More Testimonials"
Rupert Wood CEO Wasteland Ski Ltd
"We have worked with Neil and his colleagues on a number of different company issues including business acquisitions, client contract and employment matters... View More Testimonials"
Dave Dadds CEO DRD Communications Ltd
"Starting a new venture, within a new country......I needed someone who could understand the complexities and culture of the venture...... View More Testimonials"
Maren Koros CEO Afyacore
"EM Law have supported Anexsys with a number of legal issues, ranging from drafting complex IT contracts to developing conflict policies and advising on a range of complex multi-jurisdiction legal issues... View More Testimonials"
Rob Crowley MD Anexsys Ltd
Can We Help You?
We are here to help with any of your questions.
Just click "Yes" below.
Please enter your question below
Please enter your name and email address so than we can send you a response
Thank you for sending us your question. We will contact you shortly to discuss this.
Sorry, there is a technical issue. Please contact us by telephone: 0203 637 6374