EM Law are experts in advising on alternative dispute resolution. Our lead alternative dispute resolution lawyer is Joanna McKenzie who has extensive experience in advising clients on a wide range of dispute resolution matters.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to ways of resolving disputes between parties without going to court. There are a number of ADR mechanisms available to parties to a dispute. These include negotiation, mediation, expert determination, early neutral evaluation and conciliation. The CPR requires parties to give consideration to ADR throughout a case.
Negotiation is a communication process between parties that is intended to reach a compromise or agreement to the satisfaction of both parties. Negotiation is usually the starting point when trying to resolve a dispute. Negotiation does not involve a third party and discussions usually proceed on a without prejudice basis.
Expert determination is an informal alternative dispute resolution process that produces a binding decision. It involves appointing an independent expert on the subject matter and is often provided for in commercial agreements. The expert will either be agreed on by the parties or will be appointed by their nominee. The powers of the expert are usually set out in a separate ‘terms of reference’. The parties will have to pay the expert for his time and costs. The expert has no authority to make an order as to costs following the determination unless the parties grant him such authority in the contract. Expert determination is the most suitable form of alternative dispute resolution for disputes requiring technical knowledge but may not be suitable if the parties wish to be fully heard and there are issues of credibility.
Early neutral evaluation
Early neutral evaluation (ENE) is where an independent and neutral evaluator, often a QC or a retired judge, meets with parties early on to give a non-binding and confidential assessment of the dispute. ENE is usually most effective if attempted during the early stages of a case and before significant costs have been incurred. The rationale is that, once armed with the opinion, parties will be able to negotiate an outcome, with or without the assistance of a third party. There are no procedural requirements for ENE beyond those agreed between the parties. The Commercial Court specifically encourages parties to consider ENE.
Conciliation is similar to mediation except that, usually, the third party will actively assist the parties to settle the dispute. The term is widely used to describe the facilitated settlement discussions that occur in the employment arena. The advantages and disadvantages of conciliation are similar to those for mediation. In addition, parties may welcome the more pro-active approach of the third party in steering the parties towards achieving a settlement.
Advantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Saving time: Going through a court process can take months or even years. ADR can usually be arranged and undertaken on much shorter timescales, even a matter of days in some cases.
• Saving costs: Resolving a dispute through ADR is likely to be cheaper than doing so through the courts, partly because of the shorter timescales involved. Undertaking ADR at any early stage can also reduce the prospect of case management sanctions being imposed down the line.
• Flexibility, choice and control: A major advantage of ADR is that it can result in a more flexible, imaginative and practical solution than a trial. Parties are free to tailor the process to suit their needs and to reach a settlement based on their commercial interests. With some forms of ADR parties also have greater choice and control over who conducts the process.
• Confidentiality: ADR procedures can be confidential in nature, which can give parties freedom to air sensitive commercial issues and enable full and frank negotiations. In most cases, the court procedure is public.
• Other advantages: Even if the ADR process does not result in a settlement, it might produce other advantages for the parties. For example, it might narrow the issues in dispute, test the strength and weaknesses of each party’s case and allow parties to air their different perspectives. ADR commonly increases the prospect of settlement being reached before trial.
Disadvantages of Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Delay and increased costs: Where settlement is not reached and a court process is ultimately pursued, undertaking ADR can result in wasted time and costs for the parties.
• Revealing too much information: Some clients fear that ADR runs the risk of exposing their cards or strategy that they will use in court if the case does not settle. For many forms of ADR however, anything said will be subject to privilege in any future proceedings.
• Non-binding results: Settlement terms agreed through a non-binding ADR process are not enforceable. However, it is always open to the parties to formalise any agreement reached in a written and signed contract. Additionally some forms of ADR produce binding outcomes, providing greater certainty for the parties to a dispute.
• Limitation issues: Unlike in legal proceedings, most forms of ADR do not stop the clock for limitation purposes. Parties will therefore need to keep an eye on the limitation period and consider the possibility of having to issue protective legal proceedings whilst undertaking ADR.
• Risk of delay to trial: In cases where the possibility of undertaking ADR is raised at an advanced stage of litigation, there may be a risk that diverting the parties’ attention to ADR will get in the way of the court process, and could even delay the trial. Courts may be reluctant to suggest ADR where such a risk could arise, although it may be possible to conduct both processes at the same time.
Who pays the costs of Alternative Dispute Resolution?
At the end of a court case, the unsuccessful party is usually ordered to pay the successful party’s costs. Costs are, however, always at the discretion of the court. When it comes to assessing costs, the court will consider whether a party acted reasonably in refusing to agree to ADR. When deciding whether or not parties have acted unreasonably the court should bear in mind the advantages of ADR over the court process and have regard to all the circumstances of the particular case.
If the case settles with ADR, who should bear the costs is usually a matter for agreement between the parties. One common approach is that the parties agree to share the fees, expenses and other costs of the ADR process.
For any questions you may have concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution contact Joanna McKenzie.
"Neil and his team have undertaken several items of legal work covering contracts, agreements and share option schemes for IMC Worldwide... View More Testimonials"
Gavin English MD IMC Worldwide Ltd
"Neil at EM Law advised us with regards to GDPR. He was thoughtful and thorough.... View More Testimonials"
COO of a Strategic Communications Agency
"I want to thank Neil at Emerging Law for his support and guidance whilst I have been setting up my own business. He has talked me through the step by step stages and legalities involved so that I can make informed decisions about my business approach... View More Testimonials"
Ayshen Ali founder Attainers Limited
"I felt incredibly fortunate to have come across Imogen. She was fantastic at helping at every juncture... View More Testimonials"
SM, Recruitment Manager
"Neil and Lauren were both very helpful in drafting contracts I needed for my firm... View More Testimonials"
Alex Mosley, Director Perrygate Property Limited
"Neil and Helen provided us with an employment contract and terms and conditions of business. We found Neil and Helen to be extremely informative and helpful throughout the process... View More Testimonials"
Grant Lambert MD Honor Search (Digital Recruitment)
"Neil Williamson, I cannot thank enough for his work and legal advice, which had brought the great result.... View More Testimonials"
"Neil was brilliant, patient and thorough guiding me through queries setting up my business to be compliant.... View More Testimonials"
Kate York, Photographer
"Neil and I worked alongside each other for several years securing software business overseas for Crown Agents... View More Testimonials"
Nick Small Director Nick Small Consulting
"What can I say about Imogen? She was the shining star in what was a very difficult time for me.... View More Testimonials"
VR, Nutritional Chef and Culinary Manager
"Imogen....has a very personable approach and is succinct in her communication. I would highly recommend her... View More Testimonials"
KE, Development Manager
"Imogen has always given me sound, objective and carefully considered legal advice.... View More Testimonials"
MB, Senior Sponsorship Manager
"Thank you for all your help with the matters regarding my company, you have been thorough in all aspects to the finer detail... View More Testimonials"
John Taylor Director Glo-bell London Ltd
"Neil is able to address complex issues, give us advice that we can follow and come up with creative solutions... View More Testimonials"
Ismet Yucetas CEO Middle East Air Drilling Services
"Imogen is a fantastic employment lawyer. Clear, supportive and very skilled in her area.... View More Testimonials"
LC, Director at a Management Consultancy
"Neil helped us structure, negotiate and put in place our first client software-as-a-service contracts. His technical and commercial advice was invaluable - he understands exactly where we are coming from... View More Testimonials"
Lena Rosenior CEO De Graft Management Ltd
"Cardno has worked closely with EM Law since 2013. The advice and support provided to our business by EM Law has been of a high quality, relevant to our requirements and more importantly helped us to make the appropriate decisions that have contributed to the success of our business... View More Testimonials"
George Mukkath Managing Director Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd
"We have been working with Neil for many years now, more recently on a retained basis because he has become someone we trust and who understands our business requirements. ... View More Testimonials"
Rupert Wood CEO Wasteland Ski Ltd
"We have worked with Neil and his colleagues on a number of different company issues including business acquisitions, client contract and employment matters... View More Testimonials"
Dave Dadds CEO DRD Communications Ltd
"Starting a new venture, within a new country......I needed someone who could understand the complexities and culture of the venture...... View More Testimonials"
Maren Koros CEO Afyacore
"EM Law have supported Anexsys with a number of legal issues, ranging from drafting complex IT contracts to developing conflict policies and advising on a range of complex multi-jurisdiction legal issues... View More Testimonials"
Rob Crowley MD Anexsys Ltd
Can We Help You?
We are here to help with any of your questions.
Just click "Yes" below.
Please enter your question below
Please enter your name and email address so than we can send you a response
Thank you for sending us your question. We will contact you shortly to discuss this.
Sorry, there is a technical issue. Please contact us by telephone: 0203 637 6374