EM Law are experts in advising on grievance investigations and hearings. We don’t simply advise clients on the law – we guide clients on the approach to take because how the parties approach a grievance process will very much dictate the outcome.
Before commencing any grievance process an employer needs to be familiar with the principles of fairness set out in the Acas Code and the supporting non-statutory guide,
The Acas Code is intended to provide practical guidance to employers and employees and sets out “the standard of reasonable behaviour” for both parties when an employee has a grievance that cannot be resolved informally. Although the obligations placed on employees are minimal, it is still important for them and their representatives to have regard to the Code if they wish to raise a formal grievance with their employer.
Failure to follow any part of the Acas Code does not of itself make an employer liable to proceedings. However, employment tribunals must take the Acas Code into account where relevant when considering whether an employer has acted reasonably or not. Furthermore, if the employee subsequently brings certain successful claims, the tribunal can adjust the amount of compensation by up to 25% either way if the employer or the employee has unreasonably failed to comply with the Acas Code.
If it is not possible to resolve a grievance informally, an employee should raise the matter formally and without unreasonable delay with a manager who is not the subject of the grievance. The grievance should be in writing and set out the nature of the grievance. (Page 10, Acas Code.) Employers should be alert to situations where an employee raises a grievance issue within another document, for example in:
The employee should provide as much relevant factual detail as possible and ensure that the information provided is accurate and correct. This will help the employer investigate and resolve the grievance as promptly as possible. Bear in mind that the letter may end up as evidence in a subsequent tribunal claim. If there are several aspects to the employee’s grievance, it will be helpful to set these out under separate headings. The employee should provide details of any relevant witnesses who may be able to corroborate facts in the grievance, where they feel comfortable in doing so.
An investigation is a fact-finding exercise to collect all the relevant information on the issues raised in the grievance. A properly conducted investigation will enable the employer to make an informed decision on the grievance after a full consideration of all the relevant facts. Making a decision on a grievance without first completing a reasonable investigation could potentially make that decision unfair, and leave an employer vulnerable to legal action.
Investigation meetings can be difficult and emotional, particularly for the employee who has raised the grievance. The Acas investigations guide suggests that, mindful of this, the investigator should follow a structured process and pre-plan their initial questions to help keep the interview on the right track.
At the start of the meeting, the investigator should explain:
During the meeting, the investigator should ask relevant questions to gather the facts about the issues surrounding the grievance and seek evidence that may substantiate the information provided. The guide suggests that it is good practice at the end of the meeting for the investigator to ask the interviewee whether there are other witnesses they think should be interviewed and why, and check whether there is anything else that the interviewee thinks is important to tell the investigator. The investigator should also explain that it may be necessary to interview the witness again.
In addition to witness evidence, physical evidence, such as CCTV or computer or phone records may be relevant to the investigation. If physical evidence is collected, an investigator should document what it is, how it was collected and what it reveals. This can make it easier for an investigator to refer to the evidence at the conclusion of the investigation. Any physical evidence gathered should also be retained in case it needs to be viewed again at a later date.
Policies and employee contracts should clarify whether or not an employer may use CCTV recordings and personal employee data as evidence in disciplinary and grievance matters. Where this is not the case, an employer should only use such evidence where it is not practicable to establish the facts of the matter through the collection of other evidence only.
Once the investigator considers that they have established the facts surrounding the grievance, as far as is reasonably possible and appropriate, they will usually need to produce an investigation report that explains their findings. Although not essential, the Acas investigations guide suggests that a written report will be beneficial in many cases.
The meeting should be held without unreasonable delay and all parties should make every effort to attend (paragraphs 33-34 Acas Code). The Acas guide suggests that ideally the meeting should be held within five working days of the grievance being received, but this may not be appropriate in all cases, since it may not leave much opportunity for investigation. Indeed, the suggestion in both the Acas Code and the Acas guide seems to be that the employer should hold a meeting quickly and then adjourn for investigation, rather than embark on a lengthy investigation before discussing the matter with the employee. The meeting can then be reconvened days or even weeks later to discuss the matter in more detail in the light of that investigation.
Employers should consider adjourning a meeting where further investigation needs to be carried out (paragraph 34, Acas Code). In practice, this means ending the meeting and reconvening another meeting at a later date, following the investigation.
A worker or employee has the right to be accompanied to a grievance hearing by a fellow worker or a trade union representative where:
Not every type of grievance will, therefore, attract the right to be accompanied. However, it is likely to be better in practice to allow all employees who have raised a grievance to be accompanied if they wish, since it may not be clear before the hearing whether the grievance falls within the statutory definition or not.
The companion should be permitted to address the hearing (including putting the worker’s case, summing up, and responding on the worker’s behalf to any view expressed at the hearing) and to confer with the worker during the hearing. There is no right to answer questions on behalf of the worker, address the hearing contrary to the worker’s express wishes, or act in a way that prevents the employer explaining its case or prevents any other person making a contribution to it. The Acas guide does say, however, that it is good practice to allow the companion to participate as fully as possible in the hearing, including asking witnesses questions.
The Acas Code recommends that employers keep a written record of all grievance cases they deal with. It is good practice to keep a written record of all stages in a grievance investigation and hearing, including notes of interviews with witnesses, minutes of meetings and notes of any discussions held to determine the outcome of the grievance.
The employee must be informed, without unreasonable delay, of the action the employer has decided to take to resolve their grievance and of their right of appeal. Although the Acas Code (at paragraph 40) requires this to be in writing, it is good practice, once the employer has reached a decision, to reconvene the meeting and provide the employee with a face-to-face explanation of the steps the employer intends to take.
Getting the grievance appeal right is important, not least because a failure to provide a fair and impartial appeal could lead to a constructive unfair dismissal claim.
The Acas guide suggests that larger employers may wish to consider having more than one appeal stage, the final appeal to be heard by a higher level of management such as a director. However, smaller employers are likely to have only one appeal stage to their grievance procedure.
The Acas Code requires that the employee is offered a right of appeal. A failure to do so could lead to an uplift in any compensation subsequently awarded to the employee. While the Acas guide recommends imposing a time limit for disciplinary appeals and suggests that five working days is often enough to appeal a disciplinary decision, it does not make any similar suggestions in respect of grievance appeals. This does not mean that an employer cannot set a deadline in its grievance procedure for an employee’s appeal to be received. However, if the employee fails to meet the deadline, the employer should consider carefully whether it should still consider the appeal.
The employer should confirm the grievance appeal decision in writing to the employee as soon as possible after the hearing.
An employer’s failure to properly investigate or deal with a grievance alleging discrimination could , in itself, lead to a further act of discrimination and therefore an additional discrimination claim.
It was established in W A Goold (Pearmark) Ltd v McConnell and another  IRLR 516 that an employer’s failure to provide and implement a grievance procedure, as required the ERA 1996, was a breach of an implied contractual term on which an employee can resign and claim constructive dismissal.
"Neil and his team have undertaken several items of legal work covering contracts, agreements and share option schemes for IMC Worldwide... View More Testimonials"
Gavin English MD IMC Worldwide Ltd
"Neil at EM Law advised us with regards to GDPR. He was thoughtful and thorough.... View More Testimonials"
COO of a Strategic Communications Agency
"I want to thank Neil at Emerging Law for his support and guidance whilst I have been setting up my own business. He has talked me through the step by step stages and legalities involved so that I can make informed decisions about my business approach... View More Testimonials"
Ayshen Ali founder Attainers Limited
"I felt incredibly fortunate to have come across Imogen. She was fantastic at helping at every juncture... View More Testimonials"
SM, Recruitment Manager
"Neil and Lauren were both very helpful in drafting contracts I needed for my firm... View More Testimonials"
Alex Mosley, Director Perrygate Property Limited
"Neil and Helen provided us with an employment contract and terms and conditions of business. We found Neil and Helen to be extremely informative and helpful throughout the process... View More Testimonials"
Grant Lambert MD Honor Search (Digital Recruitment)
"Neil Williamson, I cannot thank enough for his work and legal advice, which had brought the great result.... View More Testimonials"
"Neil was brilliant, patient and thorough guiding me through queries setting up my business to be compliant.... View More Testimonials"
Kate York, Photographer
"Neil and I worked alongside each other for several years securing software business overseas for Crown Agents... View More Testimonials"
Nick Small Director Nick Small Consulting
"What can I say about Imogen? She was the shining star in what was a very difficult time for me.... View More Testimonials"
VR, Nutritional Chef and Culinary Manager
"Imogen....has a very personable approach and is succinct in her communication. I would highly recommend her... View More Testimonials"
KE, Development Manager
"Imogen has always given me sound, objective and carefully considered legal advice.... View More Testimonials"
MB, Senior Sponsorship Manager
"Thank you for all your help with the matters regarding my company, you have been thorough in all aspects to the finer detail... View More Testimonials"
John Taylor Director Glo-bell London Ltd
"Neil is able to address complex issues, give us advice that we can follow and come up with creative solutions... View More Testimonials"
Ismet Yucetas CEO Middle East Air Drilling Services
"Imogen is a fantastic employment lawyer. Clear, supportive and very skilled in her area.... View More Testimonials"
LC, Director at a Management Consultancy
"Neil helped us structure, negotiate and put in place our first client software-as-a-service contracts. His technical and commercial advice was invaluable - he understands exactly where we are coming from... View More Testimonials"
Lena Rosenior CEO De Graft Management Ltd
"Cardno has worked closely with EM Law since 2013. The advice and support provided to our business by EM Law has been of a high quality, relevant to our requirements and more importantly helped us to make the appropriate decisions that have contributed to the success of our business... View More Testimonials"
George Mukkath Managing Director Cardno Emerging Markets (UK) Ltd
"We have been working with Neil for many years now, more recently on a retained basis because he has become someone we trust and who understands our business requirements. ... View More Testimonials"
Rupert Wood CEO Wasteland Ski Ltd
"We have worked with Neil and his colleagues on a number of different company issues including business acquisitions, client contract and employment matters... View More Testimonials"
Dave Dadds CEO DRD Communications Ltd
"Starting a new venture, within a new country......I needed someone who could understand the complexities and culture of the venture...... View More Testimonials"
Maren Koros CEO Afyacore
"EM Law have supported Anexsys with a number of legal issues, ranging from drafting complex IT contracts to developing conflict policies and advising on a range of complex multi-jurisdiction legal issues... View More Testimonials"
Rob Crowley MD Anexsys Ltd
Can We Help You?
We are here to help with any of your questions.
Just click "Yes" below.
Please enter your question below
Please enter your name and email address so than we can send you a response
Thank you for sending us your question. We will contact you shortly to discuss this.
Sorry, there is a technical issue. Please contact us by telephone: 0203 637 6374